↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of quantitative flow ratio and fractional flow reserve with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and cardiovascular magnetic resonance as reference standard. A Dan-NICAD substudy

Overview of attention for article published in The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of quantitative flow ratio and fractional flow reserve with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and cardiovascular magnetic resonance as reference standard. A Dan-NICAD substudy
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10554-019-01737-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Sejr-Hansen, Jelmer Westra, Simon Winther, Shengxian Tu, Louise Nissen, Lars Gormsen, Steffen E. Petersen, June Ejlersen, Christin Isaksen, Hans Erik Bøtker, Morten Bøttcher, Evald H. Christiansen, Niels Ramsing Holm

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 19%
Other 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 13 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 39%
Unspecified 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,839,027
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#109
of 2,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,987
of 471,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 471,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.