| Title |
Interventions for oropharyngeal dysphagia in acute and critical care: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-1196-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sallyanne Duncan, Jennifer Mc Gaughey, Richard Fallis, Daniel F. McAuley, Margaret Walshe, Bronagh Blackwood |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 37% |
| Ireland | 6 | 12% |
| United States | 4 | 8% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 63% |
| Scientists | 12 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 135 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 16% |
| Unknown | 56 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 19% |
| Linguistics | 3 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 58 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,005,642
of 25,208,845 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#133
of 2,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,930
of 471,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#6
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,208,845 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 471,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.