↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis of spinal lesions using perfusion parameters measured by DCE-MRI and metabolism parameters measured by PET/CT

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Diagnosis of spinal lesions using perfusion parameters measured by DCE-MRI and metabolism parameters measured by PET/CT
Published in
European Spine Journal, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00586-019-06213-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiahui Zhang, Yongye Chen, Yanyan Zhang, Enlong Zhang, Hon J. Yu, Huishu Yuan, Yang Zhang, Min-Ying Su, Ning Lang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Unknown 7 64%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 18%
Neuroscience 1 9%
Unknown 8 73%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2019.
All research outputs
#18,699,437
of 23,175,240 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#2,517
of 4,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#335,977
of 457,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#32
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,175,240 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,705 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.