| Title |
Development of a transition program for adolescents with congenital heart disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Pediatrics, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00431-019-03515-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michèle de Hosson, Julie De Backer, Daniël De Wolf, Katya De Groote, Laurent Demulier, Saskia Mels, Kristof Vandekerckhove, Eva Goossens |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Greece | 1 | 7% |
| Belgium | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 29% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 29 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,163,686
of 23,812,962 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#815
of 3,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,392
of 461,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#20
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,812,962 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.