↓ Skip to main content

Impact of healthcare-associated sepsis on mortality in critically ill infants

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of healthcare-associated sepsis on mortality in critically ill infants
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00431-016-2726-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evelien Hilde Verstraete, Ludo Mahieu, Kris De Coen, Dirk Vogelaers, Stijn Blot

Abstract

Healthcare-associated sepsis (HAS) is a life-threatening complication in neonatal intensive care. Research into the impact of HAS on mortality adjusted for comorbidities is however limited. We conducted a historical cohort study to evaluate impact of HAS on mortality stratified by birth weight and risk factors for mortality in the HAS cohort. HAS was defined according to the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development criteria. Logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds of mortality. Of 5134 admissions, 342 infants developed HAS (6.7 %). Mortality in the total and HAS cohort was 5.6 and 10.5 %, respectively. The majority of HAS was caused by commensals (HAS-COM, 59.4 %) and 40.6 % by recognized pathogens (HAS-REC). Adjusted for comorbidities, "HAS-REC" is only a risk factor for mortality in newborns >1500 g (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.3, confidence interval [CI] 1.1-4.9). Post-hoc analysis identified HAS-REC as an independent risk factor for mortality in infants with gastrointestinal disease (aOR 4.8, CI 2.1-10.8). "Renal insufficiency," "focal intestinal perforation," and "necrotizing enterocolitis" are independent risk factors for mortality in the HAS cohort (aOR 13.5, CI 4.9-36.6; aOR 7.7, CI 1.5-39.2; aOR 2.1, CI 1.0-4.7, respectively). For very low birth weight infants (≤1500 g), several comorbidities overrule the impact of HAS on mortality. After adjustment for comorbidities, HAS-REC independently predicts in-hospital mortality in heavier infants and in those with gastrointestinal disease. What is Known: • The relationship between healthcare-associated sepsis and mortality is influenced by the causative pathogen and is confounded by comorbidities. • Research on impact of healthcare-associated sepsis on mortality adjusted for comorbidities is limited as well as research on independent risk factors for mortality in neonates with sepsis. What is New: • We included a large list of comorbidities and stratified risk by birth weight in order to assess the true effect of healthcare-associated sepsis on mortality. • Risk for mortality was calculated for commensal flora and for recognized pathogens as causative micro-organisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 59 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Master 7 12%
Other 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 19 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2016.
All research outputs
#13,232,464
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#2,279
of 3,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,006
of 299,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#9
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.