Title |
Taxonomic revision of the genus Schaueria (Acanthaceae)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant Systematics and Evolution, April 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00606-016-1301-y |
Authors |
Ana Luiza A. Côrtes, Thomas F. Daniel, Alessandro Rapini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 20 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
Professor | 2 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 67% |
Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#102
of 956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,861
of 312,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 956 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them