↓ Skip to main content

An investigation of multidisciplinary complex health care interventions – steps towards an integrative treatment model in the rehabilitation of People with Multiple Sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
An investigation of multidisciplinary complex health care interventions – steps towards an integrative treatment model in the rehabilitation of People with Multiple Sclerosis
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-12-50
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lasse Skovgaard, Liv Bjerre, Niels Haahr, Charlotte Paterson, Laila Launsø, Finn Boesen, Michael Nissen, Mai-Britt Ottesen, Christina Mortensen, Anette Olsen, Søren Borch, Birthe K Mortensen, Gudrun Aa Rasmussen, Kirsten Sietam, Frank Staalkjær, Karin Pedersen, Kirsten Søndermark

Abstract

The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Society initiated a large-scale bridge building and integrative treatment project to take place from 2004-2010 at a specialized Multiple Sclerosis (MS) hospital. In this project, a team of five conventional health care practitioners and five alternative practitioners was set up to work together in developing and offering individualized treatments to 200 people with MS. The purpose of this paper is to present results from the six year treatment collaboration process regarding the development of an integrative treatment model.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
Unknown 58 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Other 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 15 24%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 30%
Psychology 14 22%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 14 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,267,271
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#408
of 3,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,714
of 163,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#10
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.