↓ Skip to main content

Complete genome sequence and comparative genome analysis of a new special Yersinia enterocolitica

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Microbiology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Complete genome sequence and comparative genome analysis of a new special Yersinia enterocolitica
Published in
Archives of Microbiology, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00203-016-1229-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guoxiang Shi, Mingming Su, Junrong Liang, Ran Duan, Wenpeng Gu, Yuchun Xiao, Zhewen Zhang, Haiyan Qiu, Zheng Zhang, Yi Li, Xiaohe Zhang, Yunchao Ling, Lai Song, Meili Chen, Yongbing Zhao, Jiayan Wu, Huaiqi Jing, Jingfa Xiao, Xin Wang

Abstract

Yersinia enterocolitica is the most diverse species among the Yersinia genera and shows more polymorphism, especially for the non-pathogenic strains. Individual non-pathogenic Y. enterocolitica strains are wrongly identified because of atypical phenotypes. In this study, we isolated an unusual Y. enterocolitica strain LC20 from Rattus norvegicus. The strain did not utilize urea and could not be classified as the biotype. API 20E identified Escherichia coli; however, it grew well at 25 °C, but E. coli grew well at 37 °C. We analyzed the genome of LC20 and found the whole chromosome of LC20 was collinear with Y. enterocolitica 8081, and the urease gene did not exist on the genome which is consistent with the result of API 20E. Also, the 16 S and 23 SrRNA gene of LC20 lay on a branch of Y. enterocolitica. Furthermore, the core-based and pan-based phylogenetic trees showed that LC20 was classified into the Y. enterocolitica cluster. Two plasmids (80 and 50 k) from LC20 shared low genetic homology with pYV from the Yersinia genus, one was an ancestral Yersinia plasmid and the other was novel encoding a number of transposases. Some pathogenic and non-pathogenic Y. enterocolitica-specific genes coexisted in LC20. Thus, although it could not be classified into any Y. enterocolitica biotype due to its special biochemical metabolism, we concluded the LC20 was a Y. enterocolitica strain because its genome was similar to other Y. enterocolitica and it might be a strain with many mutations and combinations emerging in the processes of its evolution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Student > Master 2 18%
Unspecified 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 27%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 9%
Unspecified 1 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2016.
All research outputs
#18,345,259
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Microbiology
#2,147
of 2,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,278
of 300,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Microbiology
#14
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,894 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.