| Title |
Quality and contribution of food sources to Australian lungfish evaluated using fatty acids and stable isotopes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Aquatic Sciences, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00027-019-0680-x |
| Authors |
Juan Tao, Mark J. Kennard, David T. Roberts, Brian Fry, Martin J. Kainz, Yifeng Chen, Stuart E. Bunn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 5 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 17% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 17 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2019.
All research outputs
#18,701,252
of 23,177,498 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Sciences
#458
of 638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#336,387
of 458,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Sciences
#13
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,177,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 638 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.