| Title |
BITS2018: the fifteenth annual meeting of the Italian Society of Bioinformatics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12859-019-3175-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francesca Cordero, Raffaele A. Calogero, Michele Caselle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Italy | 1 | 14% |
| France | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,284,743
of 23,177,498 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,868
of 7,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,207
of 457,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#87
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,177,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.