| Title |
The Association Between Breast Cancer Prognostic Indicators and Serum 25-OH Vitamin D Levels
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-012-2297-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luke J. Peppone, Aaron S. Rickles, Michelle C. Janelsins, Michael R. Insalaco, Kristin A. Skinner |
| Abstract |
Studies show that women with low vitamin D levels have an increased risk of breast cancer (BC) incidence and mortality, but there is a lack of research examining vitamin D levels and prognostic variables in BC patients. The aim of this study is to examine 25-OH vitamin D levels between BC cases and controls and by prognostic indicators among BC cases. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 65 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2013.
All research outputs
#14,143,926
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#4,025
of 6,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,631
of 160,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#20
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.