↓ Skip to main content

The Influence of the Perioperative Nutritional Status on the Survival Outcomes for Esophageal Cancer Patients with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
The Influence of the Perioperative Nutritional Status on the Survival Outcomes for Esophageal Cancer Patients with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2019
DOI 10.1245/s10434-019-07742-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Makoto Hikage, Yusuke Taniyama, Tadashi Sakurai, Chiaki Sato, Kai Takaya, Hiroshi Okamoto, Takuro Konno, Naoto Ujiie, Takeshi Naitoh, Michiaki Unno, Takashi Kamei

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 6 24%
Unknown 9 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Psychology 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unknown 12 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2019.
All research outputs
#6,344,927
of 23,177,498 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2,111
of 6,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,265
of 342,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#76
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,177,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.