| Title |
Clear-cuts are temporary habitats, not matrix, for endangered grassland burnet moths (Zygaena spp.)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Insect Conservation, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10841-019-00193-3 |
| Authors |
Karl-Olof Bergman, Joseph Burman, Dennis Jonason, Mattias C. Larsson, Nils Ryrholm, Lars Westerberg, Per Milberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Sweden | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 6% |
| Researcher | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 11% |
| Engineering | 2 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2020.
All research outputs
#13,307,686
of 23,177,498 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Insect Conservation
#417
of 669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,796
of 326,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Insect Conservation
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,177,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.