↓ Skip to main content

Promoting mental health and wellbeing in schools: examining Mindfulness, Relaxation and Strategies for Safety and Wellbeing in English primary and secondary schools: study protocol for a multi-school…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
24 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
298 Mendeley
Title
Promoting mental health and wellbeing in schools: examining Mindfulness, Relaxation and Strategies for Safety and Wellbeing in English primary and secondary schools: study protocol for a multi-school, cluster randomised controlled trial (INSPIRE)
Published in
Trials, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13063-019-3762-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Hayes, Anna Moore, Emily Stapley, Neil Humphrey, Rosie Mansfield, Joao Santos, Emma Ashworth, Praveetha Patalay, Eva-Maria Bonin, Bettina Moltrecht, Jan R. Boehnke, Jessica Deighton

Abstract

There are increasing rates of internalising difficulties, particularly anxiety and depression, being reported in children and young people in England. School-based, universal prevention programmes are thought to be one way of helping tackle such difficulties. This protocol describes a four-arm cluster randomised controlled trial, investigating the effectiveness of three different interventions when compared to usual provision, in English primary and secondary pupils. The primary outcome for Mindfulness and Relaxation interventions is a measure of internalising difficulties, while Strategies for Safety and Wellbeing will be examined in relation to intended help-seeking. In addition to the effectiveness analysis, a process and implementation evaluation and a cost-effectiveness evaluation will be undertaken. Overall, 160 primary schools and 64 secondary schools will be recruited across England. This corresponds to 17,600 participants. Measures will be collected online at baseline, 3-6 months later, and 9-12 months after the commencement of the intervention. An economic evaluation will assess the cost-effectiveness of the interventions. Moreover, a process and implementation evaluation (including a qualitative research component) will explore several aspects of implementation (fidelity, quality, dosage, reach, participant responsiveness, adaptations), social validity (acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility), and their moderating effects on the outcomes of interest, and perceived impact. This trial aims to address important questions about whether schools' practices around the promotion of mental wellbeing and the prevention of mental health problems can: (1) be formalised into feasible and effective models of school-based support and (2) whether these practices and their effects can be sustained over time. Given the focus of these interventions on mirroring popular practice in schools and on prioritising approaches that present low-burden, high-acceptability to schools, if proved effective, and cost-effective, the findings will indicate models that are not only empirically tested but also offer high potential for widespread use and, therefore, potentially widespread benefits beyond the life of the trial. ISRCTN16386254. Registered on 30 August 2018.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 298 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 15%
Researcher 30 10%
Student > Bachelor 27 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 119 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 55 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 10%
Social Sciences 23 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 8%
Neuroscience 6 2%
Other 29 10%
Unknown 132 44%