| Title |
Consensus-based technical recommendations for clinical translation of renal T1 and T2 mapping MRI
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10334-019-00797-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ilona A. Dekkers, Anneloes de Boer, Kaniska Sharma, Eleanor F. Cox, Hildo J. Lamb, David L. Buckley, Octavia Bane, David M. Morris, Pottumarthi V. Prasad, Scott I. K. Semple, Keith A. Gillis, Paul Hockings, Charlotte Buchanan, Marcos Wolf, Christoffer Laustsen, Tim Leiner, Bryan Haddock, Johannes M. Hoogduin, Pim Pullens, Steven Sourbron, Susan Francis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 17% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 29 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 20% |
| Engineering | 7 | 10% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 39 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2019.
All research outputs
#21,075,298
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine
#420
of 514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#363,594
of 479,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine
#17
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 514 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.