| Title |
The moral case for sign language education
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Monash Bioethics Review, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40592-019-00101-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hilary Bowman-Smart, Christopher Gyngell, Angela Morgan, Julian Savulescu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 26% |
| Australia | 3 | 16% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Singapore | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 68% |
| Scientists | 3 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 53 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 5% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Linguistics | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 56 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2022.
All research outputs
#862,638
of 24,255,619 outputs
Outputs from Monash Bioethics Review
#11
of 152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,279
of 465,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Monash Bioethics Review
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,255,619 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 465,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them