↓ Skip to main content

Profiling and Validation of the Circular RNA Repertoire in Adult Murine Hearts

Overview of attention for article published in Genomics, Protenomics & Biooinformatics, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Profiling and Validation of the Circular RNA Repertoire in Adult Murine Hearts
Published in
Genomics, Protenomics & Biooinformatics, April 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.gpb.2016.02.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tobias Jakobi, Lisa F. Czaja-Hasse, Richard Reinhardt, Christoph Dieterich

Abstract

For several decades, cardiovascular diseases have been one of the leading causes of death throughout all countries. There is a strong genetic component to many disease subtypes (e.g., cardiomyopathy) and we are just beginning to understand what the relevant genetic factors are. Several studies have related RNA splicing to cardiovascular diseases and circular RNAs (circRNAs) are an emerging player in this game. circRNAs, which originate through back-splicing events from primary transcripts, are resistant to exonucleases and typically not polyadenylated. First perturbation studies show clear phenotypic outcomes for selected circRNAs. We provide, for the first time, a comprehensive catalogue of RNase R-resistant circRNA species for the adult murine heart. This work combines state-of-the-art circle sequencing with our novel DCC software to explore the circRNA landscape of heart tissue. Overall, we identified 575 circRNA species that pass a beta-binomial test for enrichment (false discovery rate of 1%) in the exonuclease-treated sequencing sample. Several circRNAs can be directly attributed to host genes that have been previously described as associated with cardiovascular diseases. Further studies of these candidate circRNAs may reveal disease-relevant properties or functions of specific circRNAs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 24%
Researcher 20 24%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 14%
Computer Science 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 21 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2016.
All research outputs
#15,184,741
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Genomics, Protenomics & Biooinformatics
#286
of 600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,063
of 312,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genomics, Protenomics & Biooinformatics
#10
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.