You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
北海道斜里町のヒグマ腸管より検出された日本海裂頭条虫
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.5686/jjzwm.24.123 |
| Authors |
佐々木 瑞希, 石名坂 豪, 能勢 峰, 浅川 満彦, 中尾 稔 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,120 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 433 | 20% |
| China | 10 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 8 | <1% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 6 | <1% |
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| Austria | 5 | <1% |
| North Macedonia | 3 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 3 | <1% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 38 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1606 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2115 | 100% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
| Scientists | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 353. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2023.
All research outputs
#93,351
of 25,756,531 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine
#1
of 88 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,793
of 358,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 88 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them