↓ Skip to main content

The topography of mutational processes in breast cancer genomes

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
244 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
452 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The topography of mutational processes in breast cancer genomes
Published in
Nature Communications, May 2016
DOI 10.1038/ncomms11383
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandro Morganella, Ludmil B. Alexandrov, Dominik Glodzik, Xueqing Zou, Helen Davies, Johan Staaf, Anieta M. Sieuwerts, Arie B. Brinkman, Sancha Martin, Manasa Ramakrishna, Adam Butler, Hyung-Yong Kim, Åke Borg, Christos Sotiriou, P. Andrew Futreal, Peter J. Campbell, Paul N. Span, Steven Van Laere, Sunil R. Lakhani, Jorunn E. Eyfjord, Alastair M. Thompson, Hendrik G. Stunnenberg, Marc J. van de Vijver, John W. M. Martens, Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale, Andrea L. Richardson, Gu Kong, Gilles Thomas, Julian Sale, Cristina Rada, Michael R. Stratton, Ewan Birney, Serena Nik-Zainal

Abstract

Somatic mutations in human cancers show unevenness in genomic distribution that correlate with aspects of genome structure and function. These mutations are, however, generated by multiple mutational processes operating through the cellular lineage between the fertilized egg and the cancer cell, each composed of specific DNA damage and repair components and leaving its own characteristic mutational signature on the genome. Using somatic mutation catalogues from 560 breast cancer whole-genome sequences, here we show that each of 12 base substitution, 2 insertion/deletion (indel) and 6 rearrangement mutational signatures present in breast tissue, exhibit distinct relationships with genomic features relating to transcription, DNA replication and chromatin organization. This signature-based approach permits visualization of the genomic distribution of mutational processes associated with APOBEC enzymes, mismatch repair deficiency and homologous recombinational repair deficiency, as well as mutational processes of unknown aetiology. Furthermore, it highlights mechanistic insights including a putative replication-dependent mechanism of APOBEC-related mutagenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 452 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
United Kingdom 5 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 426 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 115 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 20%
Student > Bachelor 38 8%
Student > Master 36 8%
Other 27 6%
Other 64 14%
Unknown 83 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 156 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 116 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 48 11%
Computer Science 19 4%
Chemistry 5 1%
Other 23 5%
Unknown 85 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 173. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2018.
All research outputs
#237,987
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#3,448
of 58,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,270
of 313,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#63
of 830 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 830 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.