| Title |
Examining Conditions that Influence Evaluation use within a Humanitarian Non-Governmental Organization in Burkina Faso (West Africa)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systemic Practice and Action Research, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11213-019-09504-w |
| Authors |
Léna D’Ostie-Racinea, Christian Dagenais, Valéry Ridde |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| France | 1 | 13% |
| Senegal | 1 | 13% |
| Myanmar | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2019.
All research outputs
#5,898,224
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Systemic Practice and Action Research
#15
of 140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,249
of 463,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systemic Practice and Action Research
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 140 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.