You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stalled developmental programs at the root of pediatric brain tumors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41588-019-0531-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Selin Jessa, Alexis Blanchet-Cohen, Brian Krug, Maria Vladoiu, Marie Coutelier, Damien Faury, Brice Poreau, Nicolas De Jay, Steven Hébert, Jean Monlong, W. Todd Farmer, Laura K. Donovan, Yixing Hu, Melissa K. McConechy, Florence M. G. Cavalli, Leonie G. Mikael, Benjamin Ellezam, Maxime Richer, Andréa Allaire, Alexander G. Weil, Jeffrey Atkinson, Jean-Pierre Farmer, Roy W. R. Dudley, Valerie Larouche, Louis Crevier, Steffen Albrecht, Mariella G. Filbin, Hervé Sartelet, Pierre-Eric Lutz, Corina Nagy, Gustavo Turecki, Santiago Costantino, Peter B. Dirks, Keith K. Murai, Guillaume Bourque, Jiannis Ragoussis, Livia Garzia, Michael D. Taylor, Nada Jabado, Claudia L. Kleinman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 25 | 29% |
| Canada | 14 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 8% |
| Germany | 6 | 7% |
| France | 5 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 47 | 55% |
| Scientists | 33 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 284 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 17% |
| Researcher | 39 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 48 | 17% |
| Unknown | 81 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 81 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 17 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Unknown | 90 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2022.
All research outputs
#429,671
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#874
of 7,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,178
of 479,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#17
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.