↓ Skip to main content

Does context matter more for hypothetical than for actual contributions? Evidence from a natural field experiment

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Economics, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 410)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Does context matter more for hypothetical than for actual contributions? Evidence from a natural field experiment
Published in
Experimental Economics, February 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10683-007-9194-9
Authors

Francisco Alpizar, Fredrik Carlsson, Olof Johansson-Stenman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Costa Rica 2 3%
United States 2 3%
France 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 66 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 27%
Student > Master 12 16%
Researcher 11 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 24 33%
Social Sciences 12 16%
Psychology 7 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 8%
Environmental Science 5 7%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 15 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 124. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2019.
All research outputs
#342,998
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Economics
#4
of 410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#789
of 177,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Economics
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them