| Title |
Natural History of Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation Detected by Implanted Loop Recorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.050 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Søren Zöga Diederichsen, Ketil Jørgen Haugan, Axel Brandes, Mathias Buus Lanng, Claus Graff, Derk Krieger, Christian Kronborg, Anders Gaarsdal Holst, Lars Køber, Søren Højberg, Jesper Hastrup Svendsen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 22% |
| Spain | 8 | 15% |
| Denmark | 4 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| Canada | 4 | 7% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 64% |
| Scientists | 9 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 113 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 19% |
| Unknown | 42 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 34% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 50 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2023.
All research outputs
#902,656
of 25,661,882 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#2,239
of 16,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,649
of 479,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#52
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,661,882 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.