| Title |
Timing of Staged Nonculprit Artery Revascularization in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction COMPLETE Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.051 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David A. Wood, John A. Cairns, Jia Wang, Roxana Mehran, Robert F. Storey, Helen Nguyen, Brandi Meeks, Vijay Kunadian, Jean-Francois Tanguay, Hahn-Ho Kim, Asim Cheema, Payam Deghani, Madhu K. Natarajan, Sanjit S. Jolly, John Amerena, Matyas Keltai, Stefan James, Ota Hlinomaz, Kari Niemela, Khalid AlHabib, Basil S. Lewis, Michel Nguyen, Jaydeep Sarma, Vladimir Dzavik, Anthony Della Siega, Shamir R. Mehta, COMPLETE Investigators |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 9% |
| Argentina | 4 | 6% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 4 | 6% |
| United States | 4 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| Mexico | 3 | 5% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 17% |
| Scientists | 10 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 32 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,152,886
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#2,796
of 16,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,655
of 476,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#62
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.