| Title |
Evaluating team-based, lecture-based, and hybrid learning methods for neurology clerkship in China: a method-comparison study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-14-98 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lian-Hong Yang, Long-Yuan Jiang, Bing Xu, Shu-Qiong Liu, Yan-Ran Liang, Jin-Hao Ye, En-Xiang Tao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 29% |
| Unknown | 24 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 31% |
| Psychology | 10 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2016.
All research outputs
#13,392,095
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,695
of 3,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,961
of 226,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#34
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.