You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
後悔がリスク志向・回避行動における意思決定に及ぼす影響 : 感情・パーソナリティ・認知要因のプロセスモデル
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, June 2000
|
| DOI | 10.11225/jcss.7.139 |
| Authors |
上市 秀雄, 楠見 孝 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2019.
All research outputs
#17,533,421
of 25,692,343 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society
#205
of 371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,238
of 40,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,692,343 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them