| Title |
A systematic review of qualitative evidence on factors enabling and deterring uptake of HIV self-testing in Africa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-7685-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bernard Njau, Christopher Covin, Esther Lisasi, Damian Damian, Declare Mushi, Andrew Boulle, Catherine Mathews |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 232 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 15% |
| Researcher | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 12% |
| Unknown | 96 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 31 | 13% |
| Unknown | 100 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,038,765
of 23,505,010 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,308
of 15,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,611
of 355,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#144
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,010 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.