| Title |
Individuals in urban dwelling primate species face unequal benefits associated with living in an anthropogenic environment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Primates, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10329-019-00775-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pascal R. Marty, Krishna N. Balasubramaniam, Stefano S. K. Kaburu, Josephine Hubbard, Brianne Beisner, Eliza Bliss-Moreau, Nadine Ruppert, Małgorzata E. Arlet, Shahrul Anuar Mohd Sah, Ahmad Ismail, Lalit Mohan, Sandeep K. Rattan, Ullasa Kodandaramaiah, Brenda McCowan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Sweden | 1 | 7% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 11 | 73% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2019.
All research outputs
#3,684,416
of 25,378,162 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#247
of 1,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,043
of 466,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 466,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.