You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Potential for increased hydrothermal arsenic flux during volcanic unrest: Implications for California water supply
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Geochemistry, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2019.104384 |
| Authors |
S.E. Ingebritsen, W.C. Evans |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Researcher | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 1 | 13% |
| Engineering | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Applied Geochemistry
#253
of 964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,913
of 350,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Geochemistry
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 964 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.