↓ Skip to main content

First-trimester multimarker prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus using targeted mass spectrometry

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
First-trimester multimarker prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus using targeted mass spectrometry
Published in
Diabetologia, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00125-016-3869-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tina Ravnsborg, Lise Lotte T. Andersen, Natacha D. Trabjerg, Lars M. Rasmussen, Dorte M. Jensen, Martin Overgaard

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with an increased risk of pre-eclampsia, macrosomia and the future development of type 2 diabetes mellitus in both mother and child. Although an early and accurate prediction of GDM is needed to allow intervention and improve perinatal outcome, no single protein biomarker has yet proven useful for this purpose. In the present study, we hypothesised that multimarker panels of serum proteins can improve first-trimester prediction of GDM among obese and non-obese women compared with single markers. A nested case-control study was performed on first-trimester serum samples from 199 GDM cases and 208 controls, each divided into an obese group (BMI ≥27 kg/m(2)) and a non-obese group (BMI <27 kg/m(2)). Based on their biological relevance to GDM or type 2 diabetes mellitus or on their previously reported potential as biomarkers for these diseases, a number of proteins were selected for targeted nano-flow liquid chromatography (LC) MS analysis. This resulted in the development and validation of a 25-plex multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) MS assay. After false discovery rate correction, six proteins remained significantly different (p<0.05) between obese GDM patients (n=135) and BMI-matched controls (n=139). These included adiponectin, apolipoprotein M and apolipoprotein D. Multimarker models combining protein levels and clinical data were then constructed and evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. For the obese, non-obese and all GDM groups, these models achieved marginally higher AUCs compared with adiponectin alone. Multimarker models combining protein markers and clinical data have the potential to predict women at a high risk of developing GDM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 27 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 30 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2016.
All research outputs
#20,567,353
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#5,224
of 5,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#289,042
of 411,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#58
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.