↓ Skip to main content

Expert consensus on an in vitro approach to assess pulmonary fibrogenic potential of aerosolized nanomaterials

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 2,806)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Expert consensus on an in vitro approach to assess pulmonary fibrogenic potential of aerosolized nanomaterials
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00204-016-1717-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy J. Clippinger, Arti Ahluwalia, David Allen, James C. Bonner, Warren Casey, Vincent Castranova, Raymond M. David, Sabina Halappanavar, Jon A. Hotchkiss, Annie M. Jarabek, Monika Maier, William Polk, Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser, Christie M. Sayes, Phil Sayre, Monita Sharma, Vicki Stone

Abstract

The increasing use of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) in consumer products and their potential to induce adverse lung effects following inhalation has lead to much interest in better understanding the hazard associated with these nanomaterials (NMs). While the current regulatory requirement for substances of concern, such as MWCNTs, in many jurisdictions is a 90-day rodent inhalation test, the monetary, ethical, and scientific concerns associated with this test led an international expert group to convene in Washington, DC, USA, to discuss alternative approaches to evaluate the inhalation toxicity of MWCNTs. Pulmonary fibrosis was identified as a key adverse outcome linked to MWCNT exposure, and recommendations were made on the design of an in vitro assay that is predictive of the fibrotic potential of MWCNTs. While fibrosis takes weeks or months to develop in vivo, an in vitro test system may more rapidly predict fibrogenic potential by monitoring pro-fibrotic mediators (e.g., cytokines and growth factors). Therefore, the workshop discussions focused on the necessary specifications related to the development and evaluation of such an in vitro system. Recommendations were made for designing a system using lung-relevant cells co-cultured at the air-liquid interface to assess the pro-fibrogenic potential of aerosolized MWCNTs, while considering human-relevant dosimetry and NM life cycle transformations. The workshop discussions provided the fundamental design components of an air-liquid interface in vitro test system that will be subsequently expanded to the development of an alternative testing strategy to predict pulmonary toxicity and to generate data that will enable effective risk assessment of NMs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 86 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 28%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Master 8 9%
Other 7 8%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 18 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Environmental Science 8 9%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 23 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2023.
All research outputs
#651,472
of 25,608,265 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#27
of 2,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,642
of 313,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#5
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,608,265 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.