↓ Skip to main content

Developing Psychologically Compelling Understanding of the Involvement of Humans in Research

Overview of attention for article published in Human Arenas, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Developing Psychologically Compelling Understanding of the Involvement of Humans in Research
Published in
Human Arenas, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s42087-019-00066-w
Authors

Kieran O’Doherty, Michael Burgess

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Researcher 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2019.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Human Arenas
#111
of 220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,796
of 370,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Arenas
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.