↓ Skip to main content

Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies a Possible Susceptibility Locus for Endometrial Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies a Possible Susceptibility Locus for Endometrial Cancer
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, June 2012
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-11-1160
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jirong Long, Wei Zheng, Yong-Bing Xiang, Felicity Lose, Deborah Thompson, Ian Tomlinson, Herbert Yu, Nicolas Wentzensen, Diether Lambrechts, Thilo Dörk, Natalia Dubrowinskaja, Marc T. Goodman, Helga B. Salvesen, Peter A. Fasching, Rodney J. Scott, Ryan Delahanty, Ying Zheng, Tracy O'Mara, Catherine S. Healey, Shirley Hodgson, Harvey Risch, Hannah P. Yang, Frederic Amant, Nurzhan Turmanov, Anita Schwake, Galina Lurie, Jone Trovik, Matthias W. Beckmann, Katie Ashton, Bu-Tian Ji, Ping-Ping Bao, Kimberly Howarth, Lingeng Lu, Jolanta Lissowska, Lieve Coenegrachts, Dilyara Kaidarova, Matthias Dürst, Pamela J. Thompson, Camilla Krakstad, Arif B. Ekici, Geoffrey Otton, Jiajun Shi, Ben Zhang, Maggie Gorman, Louise Brinton, An Coosemans, Rayna K. Matsuno, Mari K. Halle, Alexander Hein, Anthony Proietto, Hui Cai, Wei Lu, Alison Dunning, Douglas Easton, Yu-Tang Gao, Qiuyin Cai, Amanda B. Spurdle, Xiao-Ou Shu

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified more than 100 genetic loci for various cancers. However, only one is for endometrial cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Chemistry 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2015.
All research outputs
#3,236,848
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#929
of 4,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,804
of 180,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#13
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.