| Title |
Unique fine scale village spatial-temporal distributions of Anopheles farauti differ by physiological state and sex
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Parasites & Vectors, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13071-019-3815-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edgar J. M. Pollard, Tanya L. Russell, Allan Apairamo, Thomas R. Burkot |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 25% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 25% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 16% |
| Researcher | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 3 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,539,726
of 23,177,498 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#978
of 5,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,718
of 459,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#31
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,177,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.