| Title |
Feuding Fathers: How John Jewel Read Erasmus’s Jerome on the Origenist Controversy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of the Classical Tradition, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12138-019-00549-9 |
| Authors |
Madeline McMahon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| Belgium | 1 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2020.
All research outputs
#5,807,167
of 23,380,821 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of the Classical Tradition
#5
of 170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,898
of 460,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of the Classical Tradition
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,380,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 170 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.