You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
公共図書館における排外主義および反排外主義に関する書籍の所蔵調査
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Information and Media Studies, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.11304/jims.18.41 |
| Authors |
矢野 涼介 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 9 | 20% |
| Unknown | 37 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 46 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,112,024
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information and Media Studies
#1
of 20 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,414
of 381,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information and Media Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one scored the same or higher as 19 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them