↓ Skip to main content

On Fields and Mass Constraints for the Uniform Propagation of Magnetic-Flux Ropes Undergoing Isotropic Expansion

Overview of attention for article published in Solar Physics, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
On Fields and Mass Constraints for the Uniform Propagation of Magnetic-Flux Ropes Undergoing Isotropic Expansion
Published in
Solar Physics, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11207-012-0176-5
Authors

Daniel Benjamín Berdichevsky

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Greece 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 75%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 4 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2019.
All research outputs
#18,701,252
of 23,177,498 outputs
Outputs from Solar Physics
#1,209
of 1,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,587
of 278,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Solar Physics
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,177,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.