↓ Skip to main content

How parents choose to use CAM: a systematic review of theoretical models

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
How parents choose to use CAM: a systematic review of theoretical models
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, April 2009
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-9-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ava Lorenc, Yael Ilan-Clarke, Nicola Robinson, Mitch Blair

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Australia 2 2%
Switzerland 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 83 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 22%
Student > Master 11 12%
Researcher 9 10%
Other 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 22 24%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 29%
Social Sciences 14 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 12%
Psychology 9 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 15 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,072,042
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#573
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,294
of 94,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.