| Title |
Testing an active intervention to deter researchers’ use of questionable research practices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Integrity and Peer Review, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41073-019-0085-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. V. Bruton, M. Brown, D. F. Sacco, R. Didlake |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Librarian | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 4 | 27% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,779,103
of 23,371,053 outputs
Outputs from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#76
of 116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,324
of 461,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,371,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.