↓ Skip to main content

Comparative mapping of 18 equine type I genes assigned by somatic cell hybrid analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Mammalian Genome, March 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Comparative mapping of 18 equine type I genes assigned by somatic cell hybrid analysis
Published in
Mammalian Genome, March 1999
DOI 10.1007/s003359900985
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandre R. Caetano, Daniel Pomp, James D. Murray, Ann T. Bowling

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 33%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Environmental Science 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,692,405
of 23,400,864 outputs
Outputs from Mammalian Genome
#323
of 1,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,237
of 35,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammalian Genome
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,400,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,136 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.