↓ Skip to main content

Are glial cells of the Digenea (Platyhelminthes) muscle cells?

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Are glial cells of the Digenea (Platyhelminthes) muscle cells?
Published in
Parasitology Research, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00436-019-06490-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Larisa G. Poddubnaya, David I. Gibson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 75%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2020.
All research outputs
#15,590,077
of 23,177,498 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#1,803
of 3,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,195
of 459,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#33
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,177,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,803 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.