| Title |
Validation of Residual Cancer Burden as Prognostic Factor for Breast Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-019-07741-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hannah Deborah Müller, Florian Posch, Christoph Suppan, Ute Bargfrieder, Melanie Gumpoldsberger, Robert Hammer, Hubert Hauser, Nadia Dandachi, Kurt Prein, Herbert Stoeger, Sigurd Lax, Marija Balic |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 41% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Brunei Darussalam | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 41% |
| Members of the public | 11 | 38% |
| Scientists | 5 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 12% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 48% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,930,175
of 23,511,526 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#397
of 6,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,632
of 341,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#9
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,511,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,656 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.