| Title |
Avoiding Bladder Catheters During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.10.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Asim S Ahmed, Brad A Clark, Sandeep A Joshi, Girish V Nair, Jeffrey A Olson, Benzy J Padanilam, Parin J Patel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 20% |
| Japan | 4 | 11% |
| Germany | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Saint Barthélemy | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 23% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 21% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,808,465
of 25,632,496 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#425
of 1,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,754
of 479,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#14
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,632,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.