| Title |
Notes, outline and divergence times of Basidiomycota
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Fungal Diversity, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13225-019-00435-4 |
| Authors |
Mao-Qiang He, Rui-Lin Zhao, Kevin D. Hyde, Dominik Begerow, Martin Kemler, Andrey Yurkov, Eric H. C. McKenzie, Olivier Raspé, Makoto Kakishima, Santiago Sánchez-Ramírez, Else C. Vellinga, Roy Halling, Viktor Papp, Ivan V. Zmitrovich, Bart Buyck, Damien Ertz, Nalin N. Wijayawardene, Bao-Kai Cui, Nathan Schoutteten, Xin-Zhan Liu, Tai-Hui Li, Yi-Jian Yao, Xin-Yu Zhu, An-Qi Liu, Guo-Jie Li, Ming-Zhe Zhang, Zhi-Lin Ling, Bin Cao, Vladimír Antonín, Teun Boekhout, Bianca Denise Barbosa da Silva, Eske De Crop, Cony Decock, Bálint Dima, Arun Kumar Dutta, Jack W. Fell, József Geml, Masoomeh Ghobad-Nejhad, Admir J. Giachini, Tatiana B. Gibertoni, Sergio P. Gorjón, Danny Haelewaters, Shuang-Hui He, Brendan P. Hodkinson, Egon Horak, Tamotsu Hoshino, Alfredo Justo, Young Woon Lim, Nelson Menolli, Armin Mešić, Jean-Marc Moncalvo, Gregory M. Mueller, László G. Nagy, R. Henrik Nilsson, Machiel Noordeloos, Jorinde Nuytinck, Takamichi Orihara, Cheewangkoon Ratchadawan, Mario Rajchenberg, Alexandre G. S. Silva-Filho, Marcelo Aloisio Sulzbacher, Zdenko Tkalčec, Ricardo Valenzuela, Annemieke Verbeken, Alfredo Vizzini, Felipe Wartchow, Tie-Zheng Wei, Michael Weiß, Chang-Lin Zhao, Paul M. Kirk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 111 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 16% |
| Canada | 6 | 5% |
| Belgium | 5 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 5% |
| France | 4 | 4% |
| Japan | 3 | 3% |
| Panama | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 44 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 60 | 54% |
| Scientists | 50 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 289 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 11% |
| Researcher | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 43 | 15% |
| Unknown | 109 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 88 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 21 | 7% |
| Unknown | 118 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#554,588
of 25,654,566 outputs
Outputs from Fungal Diversity
#6
of 307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,186
of 479,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fungal Diversity
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them