You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis and connective tissue disorder in humans with impaired JNK1-dependent responses to IL-17A/F and TGF-β
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science Immunology, November 2019
|
DOI | 10.1126/sciimmunol.aax7965 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Juan Li, Marco Ritelli, Cindy S. Ma, Geetha Rao, Tanwir Habib, Emilie Corvilain, Salim Bougarn, Sophie Cypowyj, Lucie Grodecká, Romain Lévy, Vivien Béziat, Lei Shang, Kathryn Payne, Danielle T. Avery, Mélanie Migaud, Soraya Boucherit, Sabri Boughorbel, Andrea Guennoun, Maya Chrabieh, Franck Rapaport, Benedetta Bigio, Yuval Itan, Bertrand Boisson, Claire Fieschi, Valérie Cormier-Daire, Delfien Syx, Fransiska Malfait, Nicoletta Zoppi, Laurent Abel, Tomáš Freiberger, Harry C. Dietz, Nico Marr, Stuart G. Tangye, Marina Colombi, Jean-Laurent Casanova, Anne Puel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 107 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 20 | 19% |
France | 8 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 8 | 7% |
India | 5 | 5% |
Spain | 4 | 4% |
Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
Australia | 2 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Other | 10 | 9% |
Unknown | 46 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 72 | 67% |
Scientists | 27 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 30% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Professor | 2 | 5% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 16% |
Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 14 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2023.
All research outputs
#591,952
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Science Immunology
#424
of 1,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,180
of 379,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Immunology
#10
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 138.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.