↓ Skip to main content

A randomized, double blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial of silymarin in ulcerative colitis

Overview of attention for article published in Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 673)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
A randomized, double blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial of silymarin in ulcerative colitis
Published in
Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11655-012-1026-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mansoor Rastegarpanah, Reza Malekzadeh, Homayoun Vahedi, Maryam Mohammadi, Elham Elahi, Meghedi Chaharmahali, Tahereh Safarnavadeh, Mohammad Abdollahi

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of silymarin in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. METHODS: A randomized double blinded placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted in 80 UC patients whose disease had been documented and were in remission state between September 2009 and October 2010. Patients were assigned to silymarin group (42 cases) and placebo group (38 cases) using a random number table. Either silymarin (140 mg) or placebo (lactose mono-hydrate, corn starch magnesium stearate) tablets were given once daily for 6 months along with their standard therapy. The efficacies were assessed by disease activity index (DAI), frequency difference of the disease flare-up, and paraclinical data. RESULTS: Ten patients (4 in the silymarin group due to nausea and 6 in the placebo group due to disease flare-up and abdominal pain) discontinued the study. An improvement in hemoglobin level (11.8±1.6 g/dL vs. 13.4±1.2 g/dL, P<0.05) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (23.7±11.5 mm/h vs. 10.8±3.2 mm/h, P<0.05) was observed in the silymarin group but not in the placebo group. DAI significantly decreased in the silymarin group and reached from 11.3±3.5 to 10.7±2.8 (P<0.05). Thirty-five out of 38 patients in the silymarin group were in complete remission with no flare-up after 6 months as compared to 21 out of 32 patients in the placebo group (P=0.5000). CONCLUSION: Silymarin as a natural supplement may be used in UC patients to maintain remission.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 53 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Professor 4 7%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 17 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 20 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,683,183
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine
#36
of 673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,577
of 161,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 673 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.