↓ Skip to main content

Genetic Analysis of ‘PAX6-Negative’ Individuals with Aniridia or Gillespie Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic Analysis of ‘PAX6-Negative’ Individuals with Aniridia or Gillespie Syndrome
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2016
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0153757
Pubmed ID
Authors

Morad Ansari, Jacqueline Rainger, Isabel M. Hanson, Kathleen A. Williamson, Freddie Sharkey, Louise Harewood, Angela Sandilands, Jill Clayton-Smith, Helene Dollfus, Pierre Bitoun, Francoise Meire, Judy Fantes, Brunella Franco, Birgit Lorenz, David S. Taylor, Fiona Stewart, Colin E. Willoughby, Meriel McEntagart, Peng Tee Khaw, Carol Clericuzio, Lionel Van Maldergem, Denise Williams, Ruth Newbury-Ecob, Elias I. Traboulsi, Eduardo D. Silva, Mukhlis M. Madlom, David R. Goudie, Brian W. Fleck, Dagmar Wieczorek, Juergen Kohlhase, Alice D. McTrusty, Carol Gardiner, Christopher Yale, Anthony T. Moore, Isabelle Russell-Eggitt, Lily Islam, Melissa Lees, Philip L. Beales, Stephen J. Tuft, Juan B. Solano, Miranda Splitt, Jens Michael Hertz, Trine E. Prescott, Deborah J. Shears, Ken K. Nischal, Martine Doco-Fenzy, Fabienne Prieur, I. Karen Temple, Katherine L. Lachlan, Giuseppe Damante, Danny A. Morrison, Veronica van Heyningen, David R. FitzPatrick

Abstract

We report molecular genetic analysis of 42 affected individuals referred with a diagnosis of aniridia who previously screened as negative for intragenic PAX6 mutations. Of these 42, the diagnoses were 31 individuals with aniridia and 11 individuals referred with a diagnosis of Gillespie syndrome (iris hypoplasia, ataxia and mild to moderate developmental delay). Array-based comparative genomic hybridization identified six whole gene deletions: four encompassing PAX6 and two encompassing FOXC1. Six deletions with plausible cis-regulatory effects were identified: five that were 3' (telomeric) to PAX6 and one within a gene desert 5' (telomeric) to PITX2. Sequence analysis of the FOXC1 and PITX2 coding regions identified two plausibly pathogenic de novo FOXC1 missense mutations (p.Pro79Thr and p.Leu101Pro). No intragenic mutations were detected in PITX2. FISH mapping in an individual with Gillespie-like syndrome with an apparently balanced X;11 reciprocal translocation revealed disruption of a gene at each breakpoint: ARHGAP6 on the X chromosome and PHF21A on chromosome 11. In the other individuals with Gillespie syndrome no mutations were identified in either of these genes, or in HCCS which lies close to the Xp breakpoint. Disruption of PHF21A has previously been implicated in the causation of intellectual disability (but not aniridia). Plausibly causative mutations were identified in 15 out of 42 individuals (12/32 aniridia; 3/11 Gillespie syndrome). Fourteen of these mutations presented in the known aniridia genes; PAX6, FOXC1 and PITX2. The large number of individuals in the cohort with no mutation identified suggests greater locus heterogeneity may exist in both isolated and syndromic aniridia than was previously appreciated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 14%
Other 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 22 34%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Unspecified 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 14 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2017.
All research outputs
#6,687,586
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#96,001
of 223,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,648
of 313,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,677
of 5,043 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,043 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.