| Title |
Effectiveness of intracavitary electrocardiogram-guided peripherally inserted central catheter tip placement in premature infants: a multicentre pre-post intervention study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Pediatrics, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00431-019-03524-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ai-qing Xiao, Jing Sun, Li-hui Zhu, Zhen-yu Liao, Ping Shen, Lin-lin Zhao, Jos M. Latour |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 13% |
| France | 2 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
| Scientists | 3 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 22 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,452,555
of 25,804,096 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#876
of 4,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,907
of 480,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#20
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,804,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.