↓ Skip to main content

尿素を迅速高感度に検出するウレアーゼ–ヘッドスペース法の開発―尿中薬物鑑定における資料妥当性試験に向けて―

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Forensic Science and Technology, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
尿素を迅速高感度に検出するウレアーゼ–ヘッドスペース法の開発―尿中薬物鑑定における資料妥当性試験に向けて―
Published in
Japanese Journal of Forensic Science and Technology, January 2019
DOI 10.3408/jafst.750
Authors

浅井 龍太郎, 鎌田 徹, 新田 篤志, 和田 美暁, 掛橋 秀直, 中野 史保子, 松田 駿太朗, 志摩 典明, 西岡 裕, 三木 昭宏, 片木 宗弘

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2019.
All research outputs
#16,555,016
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Forensic Science and Technology
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,037
of 446,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Forensic Science and Technology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them