↓ Skip to main content

Determinants of sinus rhythm maintenance in patients with early-persistent atrial fibrillation and heart failure

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Research in Cardiology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Determinants of sinus rhythm maintenance in patients with early-persistent atrial fibrillation and heart failure
Published in
Clinical Research in Cardiology, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00392-019-01581-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruben R. de With, Michiel Rienstra, Harry J. G. M. Crijns, Isabelle C. Van Gelder

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2019.
All research outputs
#18,701,252
of 23,177,498 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#673
of 840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#337,345
of 459,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,177,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.